The True Cost of Downtime: Why Quality Lifting Equipment Pays Off

Aug 12, 2025 | Lifting Equipment, Posts

Downtime adds up fast  and not every “budget” lifting system saves money

In railway and industrial operations, unplanned downtime can quickly transform from a mere nuisance to a financial sinkhole.

According to recent industry estimates, the average cost of unscheduled downtime can reach up to $260,000 per hour depending on the sector and the complexity of the disruption. In the rail sector, these costs quickly escalate when maintenance crews are left idle, rolling stock is grounded, and schedules go off track.

So why do some operations still choose low-end lifting equipment?

Because the upfront savings look good on a spreadsheet, until the first jack failure brings everything to a halt.

The hard truth is this: not every CAPEX saving is a smart investment. Lifting systems that underperform, break down, or require frequent manual intervention introduce a hidden liability into your operation, one that shows up not just in lost time, but in cascading operational and reputational costs.

But what exactly does downtime cost you beyond the obvious? Let’s break down the real impact, from direct financial losses to the operational strain that rarely shows up in reports but always hits where it hurts.

What is downtime really costing your rail operation?

When a lifting jack fails mid-operation or a hoist system can’t meet load demands, the consequences go far beyond a missed maintenance window. In heavy-duty rail environments, downtime ends up being an operational cascade, Trains are delayed. Crews stand idle. Workflows grind to a halt. 

And while the failure might trace back to a single piece of equipment, the financial and logistical fallout extends across the entire organisation.

Yet many of these costs remain hidden, buried in general ledgers or dismissed as routine slowdowns. Over time, they become accepted as the “cost of doing business,” when in reality, they’re symptoms of underperforming infrastructure. 

If your lifting systems are ageing, poorly synchronised, or not designed for your specific fleet requirements, you’re likely absorbing downtime costs without even realising it.

These are the immediate, measurable impacts, the ones that hit budgets and schedules the hardest:

  • Labour standstill: Skilled maintenance teams waiting on a faulty lift system is wasted payroll. Multiply that across a multi-hour delay and multiple shifts, and the loss becomes substantial.
  • Disrupted maintenance cycles: Scheduled inspections or overhauls depend on tight timing. A lifting failure throws off the entire rotation, creating backlogs and compliance risks.
  • Regulatory and contractual penalties: In service-driven operations, delays can result in fines or contractual breaches, especially if rolling stock can’t be returned to service within agreed windows.
  • Compounded mechanical wear: Equipment forced to compensate for subpar lifting, such as uneven elevation or repeated resets, may suffer damage, leading to costly downstream repairs.

Indirect costs that quietly erode performance

These may not show up immediately in spreadsheets, but they build pressure across teams, departments, and long-term planning:

  • Team morale and burnout: Frequent downtime creates reactive work conditions. Teams are forced into rushed repairs, overtime, or constant catch-up, all of which raise the risk of mistakes and injury.
  • Client and stakeholder perception: Reliability is currency in the rail industry. Missed timelines, repeated delays, or “technical issues” that keep recurring send a strong signal to partners and it’s not a good one.
  • Inefficiency chain reaction: When a lift delay pushes back one task, it often compresses others. This can force maintenance managers into difficult decisions like skipping optional checks or reallocating already stretched resources.
  • Management distraction: Instead of focusing on proactive improvements, senior staff are pulled into urgent triage coordinating replacements, revising schedules, or managing supplier disputes.

These costs, though less visible , are often more damaging over time. They introduce unpredictability, reduce operational confidence, and make it harder to scale or optimize.

Why low-quality lifting equipment fails so often and takes your schedule down with it

In high-demand rail environments, lifting systems are expected to do more than just raise rolling stock, they need to perform with absolute precision, day after day, under variable loads and environmental stress. 

Unfortunately, not all equipment is built for this level of reliability. What may look sufficient during procurement, especially when price is the main filter, often fails under the realities of daily industrial use.

Many “budget-friendly” lifting systems compromise on the very components that determine performance under load: material integrity, synchronisation logic, control responsiveness, and adaptability to different vehicle types. 

These weaknesses don’t always appear right away, which makes them even more dangerous, the equipment appears fine until it isn’t, and failure usually happens when you’re mid-operation and most vulnerable.

Common failure points in low-grade lifting systems

  • Material fatigue under load
    Cheaper equipment often uses lower-grade steel or aluminium alloys with limited fatigue resistance. Over time, especially under cyclical stress, these components develop cracks, deformations, or complete structural failure. This not only halts operations but introduces serious safety hazards for personnel and rolling stock.
  • Desynchronised jacks and uneven lifting
    Poor-quality systems often lack reliable synchronisation mechanisms. When jacks don’t raise at the same speed or torque, they create torsional stress on the vehicle’s frame, risking structural damage and making the lift inherently unsafe. Teams then spend extra time resetting or manually adjusting, adding avoidable delays.
  • Load rating vs. real-world conditions
    Some systems are rated based on optimal lab conditions, not the realities of uneven ground, multi-car configurations, or variations in rail vehicle weight. Under these circumstances, “rated” capacities may be easily exceeded, causing system strain or automatic shutdowns.
  • Inflexibility and poor compatibility
    As rail fleets diversify with mixed configurations of passenger cars, locomotives, light rail vehicles or maintenance-of-way equipment, lifting systems must adapt. Low-end equipment is often built to a narrow spec, making it incompatible with newer models or alternative wheelbases. Every time your fleet changes, the system becomes more obsolete.
  • Lack of technical support or after-sales service
    Many low-cost providers cut costs not only in design but in service. When failures occur, there’s limited access to diagnostics, replacement parts, or trained technicians. This extends the downtime window dramatically, sometimes turning a two-hour repair into a multi-day disruption.

Rail operators rarely plan for failure, but failure is exactly what underbuilt lifting systems deliver. And by the time the real costs emerge, the initial “savings” from a lower quote are long gone.

The role of lifting equipment in preventing downtime

Most rail operators think about lifting systems as tools for scheduled maintenance, raise the vehicle, do the job, lower it, move on. 

But in reality, lifting equipment plays a far more strategic role in preventing downtime altogether. It’s not just about what happens during the lift, it’s about everything that doesn’t happen when your equipment performs as it should.

A high-quality, synchronised lifting system is an operational safeguard. It ensures that inspections stay on track. It gives technicians confidence to work quickly and safely. It helps detect structural issues early by offering stable, precise elevation. 

And above all, it keeps trains moving on schedule, because even a perfect maintenance crew can’t work around unreliable lifting gear.

When your lifting system is the weak link, it turns every inspection into a gamble. When it’s engineered for durability and control, it becomes an asset,  not just a tool.

What happens when a jack fails? Everything stops.

Lifting equipment failure is a hard stop for operations. It’s not something you can work around and the fallout is immediate:

  • The vehicle remains in place, blocking tracks or maintenance bays
  • Crews are pulled from other tasks to troubleshoot or improvise solutions
  • Safety procedures must be initiated, including inspections or lockdowns
  • Management diverts attention to damage control and rescheduling

Worse still, it raises the risk of cascading delays. If one train can’t leave the yard, others can’t enter. If maintenance gets compressed, standards drop. And if incidents repeat, operational trust erodes, both internally and externally.

Precision and power are non-negotiable in modern rail operations

Today’s rail environments demand more than brute lifting force. The equipment must offer real-time synchronisation, programmable control, and uniform load distribution, especially for newer or mixed-configuration fleets. Anything less increases risk.

That’s why Railquip’s heavy-duty lifting jacks are engineered to perform reliably under continuous industrial loads.

Our systems are designed with real-world rail maintenance in mind, harsh environments, long duty cycles, and zero tolerance for unscheduled interruption. Whether it’s lifting a single locomotive or servicing multiple railcars simultaneously, precision matters. Not just for the quality of the lift, but for the continuity of your entire operation.

Why Railquip lifting equipment makes the difference shift after shift

When it comes to industrial rail maintenance, good enough simply isn’t good enough. You need lifting equipment that can keep pace with the pressure, complexity, and accountability of your operation day in and day out, without excuses.

At Railquip, we don’t build equipment to meet the minimum. We engineer systems that outlast, out-perform, and out-protect because that’s what real-world rail operations demand. Every jack we deliver is designed to be a long-term solution to downtime, not a contributor to it.

Here’s why so many rail operators across North America trust Railquip to keep them moving:

1. Durability that withstands industrial reality

Railquip lifting systems are constructed using high-resistance alloys and heavy-duty components specifically selected for long-term fatigue resistance. These materials don’t just meet load requirements, they hold up under continuous use, in harsh conditions, over thousands of cycles. The result? Lower mechanical wear, fewer part replacements, and dramatically less intervention over time.

2. Synchronized precision, every time

Our jacks are fully synchronised using real-time electronic control systems, ensuring uniform elevation across all lifting points. That means safer working conditions, lower risk of structural strain, and greater confidence during sensitive tasks. Whether you’re lifting one axle or an entire trainset, every jack moves in perfect harmony, no lag, no drift, no surprises.

3. Broad compatibility and future-ready design

From locomotives and passenger cars to light rail vehicles and specialty units, Railquip systems are engineered for adaptability. Our lifting solutions are compatible with a wide range of vehicle geometries and wheelbases, and they can be configured to support evolving fleet requirements, including newer model specs and service bay constraints.

4. Minimal maintenance, maximum uptime

Because our systems are built for endurance, corrective maintenance is rare. Integrated diagnostics and straightforward service access make inspections fast and efficient. That means your team can spend less time fixing equipment and more time doing the work that matters.

Don’t let your lifting system be the reason you fall behind

Downtime doesn’t have to be inevitable and it definitely shouldn’t be caused by the very equipment designed to keep you running. With Railquip, you’re not just buying lifting gear. You’re investing in operational resilience, safety, and long-term performance.
Explore our full line of heavy-duty lifting systems or speak with a Railquip expert to see how we can support your maintenance goals. Visit railquip.com to get started.

Frequently Asked Questions

How often should lifting equipment be inspected to prevent unexpected downtime?

Regular inspections are recommended at least every 6–12 months, but frequency may increase depending on duty cycles, load types, and environmental conditions. Preventive checks help catch wear or synchronization issues before they cause disruptions.

What are typical warning signs that it’s time to upgrade from low-end lifting equipment?

Frequent service calls, inconsistent syncing, longer maintenance cycles, and inability to support new fleet types or regulatory compliance are key indicators that existing jacks or hoists are degrading or becoming obsolete.

What certifications or safety standards should rail lifting systems meet?

Reputable rail lifting systems in the United States should comply with ANSI/ALI ALCTV safety standards for vehicle lifts and ASME B30 standards for hoisting equipment. They should also meet OSHA requirements for workplace safety and, where applicable, AAR (Association of American Railroads) specifications for rail industry operations. Additionally, ISO 9001 certification can indicate strong manufacturing quality controls.

Latest Posts